* feat: support goal mode for claude on bedrock
* fix failing lint test
* addressing greptile comments
* fixing failed test
* address greptile: copy output_config and warn on dropped converse format
* fix(bedrock): skip redundant output_config normalization on Converse reasoning_effort path
When reasoning_effort is mapped via _handle_reasoning_effort_parameter, the
resulting output_config is already normalized via
normalize_bedrock_opus_output_config_effort. Mark it as normalized so
_prepare_request_params can skip the redundant call (and the associated
get_model_info lookup) on every request.
Co-authored-by: Yassin Kortam <yassin@berri.ai>
* test(reasoning-effort-grid): reflect Bedrock opus-4-6 xhigh→max clamping
* fix(bedrock): stop leaking output_config marker and message-content mutation
* fix(bedrock): guard effort key access in normalize_bedrock_opus_output_config_effort
Defensively check that 'effort' is a valid key in _BEDROCK_OUTPUT_CONFIG_EFFORT_ORDER
before indexing, to prevent a KeyError if the hardcoded guard tuple ever drifts from
the order dict's keys.
Co-authored-by: Yassin Kortam <yassin@berri.ai>
* fix(bedrock): drop dead second clause in effort normalization guard
The 'effort not in _BEDROCK_OUTPUT_CONFIG_EFFORT_ORDER' check is
unreachable once 'effort not in ("xhigh", "max")' has been ruled out,
since both literals are present in the order dict. Keep the literal
membership check and let the dict lookups below speak for themselves.
* fix(bedrock): clamp output_config.effort against ceiling for any known value
The early return when effort was not 'xhigh'/'max' meant a ceiling of
'low' or 'medium' would silently forward an out-of-range value. Gate on
the known effort ordering instead so the ceiling comparison runs for
every recognized effort.
* test(grid_spec): use _CAPS_OPUS_4_7 for non-Bedrock opus-4-6 entries
claude-opus-4-6 now declares supports_xhigh_reasoning_effort in the model
map, so production accepts xhigh on Azure AI and Vertex AI routes. Update
those grid_spec entries to match production capabilities so expected()
predicts 200 for xhigh instead of 400.
Co-authored-by: Yassin Kortam <yassin@berri.ai>
* test(grid_spec): revert xhigh caps for non-Bedrock opus-4-6
azure_ai/claude-opus-4-6 and vertex_ai/claude-opus-4-6 do not declare
supports_xhigh_reasoning_effort in model_prices_and_context_window.json.
Azure AI upstream rejects xhigh with HTTP 400 ("Supported levels: high,
low, max, medium"). Restore _CAPS_4_6 so the grid predicts 400 for
xhigh, matching production capabilities.
* fix: stop advertising xhigh effort on Opus 4.5/4.6
Only Opus 4.7 supports the xhigh reasoning effort level. Remove the
supports_xhigh_reasoning_effort flag from every Opus 4.5 and Opus 4.6
entry (direct Anthropic, Bedrock, and regional variants) in both model
catalog files.
On the direct Anthropic path there is no effort clamp, so flagging 4.5/4.6
as xhigh-capable caused litellm to forward xhigh to a model that rejects it
(and made get_model_info misreport the capability). xhigh now correctly
degrades to high / raises on those models.
Bedrock graceful degradation for Claude Code goal mode is unaffected: it
relies solely on the bedrock_output_config_effort_ceiling clamp (4.5->high,
4.6->max, 4.7->xhigh), which runs before validation, so xhigh requests to
older Bedrock Opus models are still silently lowered rather than rejected.
Update effort-gating tests to reflect that 4.5/4.6 no longer accept xhigh.
* fix: clamp xhigh effort on Bedrock Invoke /v1/messages instead of rejecting
Claude Code "goal mode" sends output_config.effort=xhigh over the Anthropic
/v1/messages API, which routes Bedrock models through
AmazonAnthropicClaudeMessagesConfig. That path validated effort against the
model's native capability and raised 400 for xhigh on Opus 4.6, while the
chat-completions paths (Converse + Invoke) already clamp xhigh to the model's
bedrock_output_config_effort_ceiling. That asymmetry broke goal mode on the
exact API surface Claude Code uses.
Apply the same ceiling clamp on the messages path before the shared effort
gate runs, so xhigh degrades to max on Opus 4.6 (and stays xhigh on 4.7).
Scoped to adaptive-thinking models and to models that declare a ceiling, so
Sonnet 4.6 (no ceiling) and Opus 4.5 (budget mode) are unaffected and still
reject xhigh.
* fix(bedrock): preserve user output_config when applying reasoning_effort
- Converse path: merge mapped effort into existing output_config via
setdefault instead of overwriting it, matching the Anthropic Messages
path. Prevents user-supplied output_config.format from being silently
dropped when reasoning_effort is also provided.
- tests: clear _get_local_model_cost_map lru_cache in the autouse
fixture alongside get_bedrock_response_stream_shape to avoid stale
cache leakage between tests.
Co-authored-by: Yassin Kortam <yassin@berri.ai>
* fix(bedrock): pre-clamp reasoning_effort for chat invoke; correct test caps
- Add _clamp_adaptive_reasoning_effort_for_bedrock to AmazonAnthropicClaudeConfig
so raw reasoning_effort=xhigh degrades to the model's bedrock effort ceiling
before AnthropicConfig.map_openai_params converts it to output_config.
Mirrors converse path (_handle_reasoning_effort_parameter) and messages path
(_clamp_adaptive_reasoning_effort_for_bedrock) so the three Bedrock paths
are consistent.
- grid_spec: restore caps=_CAPS_4_6 for Bedrock converse/invoke Opus 4.6 entries
so the test reflects the model's actual JSON capabilities. Teach expected()
to bypass the xhigh/max cap check when bedrock_effort_ceiling will clamp
the wire effort, so the test still passes for Bedrock's graceful degradation
contract without lying about native model caps.
Co-authored-by: Yassin Kortam <yassin@berri.ai>
---------
Co-authored-by: Dennis Henry <dennis.henry@okta.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yassin Kortam <yassin@berri.ai>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .circleci | ||
| .devcontainer | ||
| .github | ||
| .semgrep/rules | ||
| backend | ||
| ci_cd | ||
| cookbook | ||
| db_scripts | ||
| deploy | ||
| dist | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| enterprise | ||
| gateway | ||
| helm/litellm | ||
| litellm | ||
| litellm-proxy-extras | ||
| migrations | ||
| scripts | ||
| terraform/litellm | ||
| tests | ||
| ui | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .flake8 | ||
| .git-blame-ignore-revs | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitguardian.yaml | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .npmrc | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| ARCHITECTURE.md | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| codecov.yaml | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| cosign.pub | ||
| docker-compose.hardened.yml | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| GEMINI.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| license_cache.json | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mcp_servers.json | ||
| model_prices_and_context_window.json | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| policy_templates.json | ||
| prometheus.yml | ||
| provider_endpoints_support.json | ||
| proxy_server_config.yaml | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| pyrightconfig.json | ||
| README.md | ||
| render.yaml | ||
| ruff.toml | ||
| schema.prisma | ||
| security.md | ||
| taplo.toml | ||
| uv.lock | ||
🚅 LiteLLM
LiteLLM AI Gateway
Open Source AI Gateway for 100+ LLMs. Self-hosted. Enterprise-ready. Call any LLM in OpenAI format.
LiteLLM Proxy Server (AI Gateway) | Hosted Proxy | Enterprise Tier | Website
What is LiteLLM
LiteLLM is an open source AI Gateway that gives you a single, unified interface to call 100+ LLM providers — OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock, Azure, and more — using the OpenAI format.
Use it as a Python SDK for direct library integration, or deploy the AI Gateway (Proxy Server) as a centralized service for your team or organization.
Jump to LiteLLM Proxy (LLM Gateway) Docs
Jump to Supported LLM Providers
Why LiteLLM
Managing LLM calls across providers gets complicated fast — different SDKs, auth patterns, request formats, and error types for every model. LiteLLM removes that friction:
- Unified API — one interface for 100+ LLMs, no provider-specific SDK juggling
- Drop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code
- Production-ready gateway — virtual keys, spend tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and an admin dashboard out of the box
- 8ms P95 latency at 1k RPS (benchmarks)
OSS Adopters
Netflix |
Features
LLMs - Call 100+ LLMs (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
All Supported Endpoints - /chat/completions, /responses, /embeddings, /images, /audio, /batches, /rerank, /a2a, /messages and more.
Python SDK
uv add litellm
from litellm import completion
import os
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"] = "your-anthropic-key"
# OpenAI
response = completion(model="openai/gpt-4o", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}])
# Anthropic
response = completion(model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}])
AI Gateway (Proxy Server)
Getting Started - E2E Tutorial - Setup virtual keys, make your first request
uv tool install 'litellm[proxy]'
litellm --model gpt-4o
import openai
client = openai.OpenAI(api_key="anything", base_url="http://0.0.0.0:4000")
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
Agents - Invoke A2A Agents (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
Supported Providers - LangGraph, Vertex AI Agent Engine, Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock AgentCore, Pydantic AI
Python SDK - A2A Protocol
from litellm.a2a_protocol import A2AClient
from a2a.types import SendMessageRequest, MessageSendParams
from uuid import uuid4
client = A2AClient(base_url="http://localhost:10001")
request = SendMessageRequest(
id=str(uuid4()),
params=MessageSendParams(
message={
"role": "user",
"parts": [{"kind": "text", "text": "Hello!"}],
"messageId": uuid4().hex,
}
)
)
response = await client.send_message(request)
AI Gateway (Proxy Server)
Step 1. Add your Agent to the AI Gateway
Step 2. Call Agent via A2A SDK
from a2a.client import A2ACardResolver, A2AClient
from a2a.types import MessageSendParams, SendMessageRequest
from uuid import uuid4
import httpx
base_url = "http://localhost:4000/a2a/my-agent" # LiteLLM proxy + agent name
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer sk-1234"} # LiteLLM Virtual Key
async with httpx.AsyncClient(headers=headers) as httpx_client:
resolver = A2ACardResolver(httpx_client=httpx_client, base_url=base_url)
agent_card = await resolver.get_agent_card()
client = A2AClient(httpx_client=httpx_client, agent_card=agent_card)
request = SendMessageRequest(
id=str(uuid4()),
params=MessageSendParams(
message={
"role": "user",
"parts": [{"kind": "text", "text": "Hello!"}],
"messageId": uuid4().hex,
}
)
)
response = await client.send_message(request)
MCP Tools - Connect MCP servers to any LLM (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
Python SDK - MCP Bridge
from mcp import ClientSession, StdioServerParameters
from mcp.client.stdio import stdio_client
from litellm import experimental_mcp_client
import litellm
server_params = StdioServerParameters(command="python", args=["mcp_server.py"])
async with stdio_client(server_params) as (read, write):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
await session.initialize()
# Load MCP tools in OpenAI format
tools = await experimental_mcp_client.load_mcp_tools(session=session, format="openai")
# Use with any LiteLLM model
response = await litellm.acompletion(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What's 3 + 5?"}],
tools=tools
)
AI Gateway - MCP Gateway
Step 1. Add your MCP Server to the AI Gateway
Step 2. Call MCP tools via /chat/completions
curl -X POST 'http://0.0.0.0:4000/v1/chat/completions' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer sk-1234' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"model": "gpt-4o",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the latest open PR"}],
"tools": [{
"type": "mcp",
"server_url": "litellm_proxy/mcp/github",
"server_label": "github_mcp",
"require_approval": "never"
}]
}'
Use with Cursor IDE
{
"mcpServers": {
"LiteLLM": {
"url": "http://localhost:4000/mcp/",
"headers": {
"x-litellm-api-key": "Bearer sk-1234"
}
}
}
}
Supported Providers (Website Supported Models | Docs)
Get Started
You can use LiteLLM through either the Proxy Server or Python SDK. Both give you a unified interface to access multiple LLMs (100+ LLMs). Choose the option that best fits your needs:
| LiteLLM AI Gateway | LiteLLM Python SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Use Case | Central service (LLM Gateway) to access multiple LLMs | Use LiteLLM directly in your Python code |
| Who Uses It? | Gen AI Enablement / ML Platform Teams | Developers building LLM projects |
| Key Features | Centralized API gateway with authentication and authorization, multi-tenant cost tracking and spend management per project/user, per-project customization (logging, guardrails, caching), virtual keys for secure access control, admin dashboard UI for monitoring and management | Direct Python library integration in your codebase, Router with retry/fallback logic across multiple deployments (e.g. Azure/OpenAI) - Router, application-level load balancing and cost tracking, exception handling with OpenAI-compatible errors, observability callbacks (Lunary, MLflow, Langfuse, etc.) |
Stable Release: Use docker images with the -stable tag. These have undergone 12 hour load tests, before being published. More information about the release cycle here
Support for more providers. Missing a provider or LLM Platform, raise a feature request.
Run in Developer Mode
Services
- Setup .env file in root
- Run dependant services
docker-compose up db prometheus
Backend
- (In root) create virtual environment
python -m venv .venv - Activate virtual environment
source .venv/bin/activate - Install dependencies
uv sync --all-extras --group proxy-dev uv run prisma generateprisma generate- Start proxy backend
python litellm/proxy/proxy_cli.py
Frontend
- Navigate to
ui/litellm-dashboard - Install dependencies
npm install - Run
npm run devto start the dashboard
Verify Docker Image Signatures
All LiteLLM Docker images published to GHCR are signed with cosign. Every release is signed with the same key introduced in commit 0112e53.
Verify using the pinned commit hash (recommended):
A commit hash is cryptographically immutable, so this is the strongest way to ensure you are using the original signing key:
cosign verify \
--key https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BerriAI/litellm/0112e53046018d726492c814b3644b7d376029d0/cosign.pub \
ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:<release-tag>
Verify using a release tag (convenience):
Tags are protected in this repository and resolve to the same key. This option is easier to read but relies on tag protection rules:
cosign verify \
--key https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BerriAI/litellm/<release-tag>/cosign.pub \
ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:<release-tag>
Replace <release-tag> with the version you are deploying (e.g. v1.83.0-stable).
Enterprise
For companies that need better security, user management and professional support
Get an Enterprise License Talk to founders
This covers:
- ✅ Features under the LiteLLM Commercial License:
- ✅ Feature Prioritization
- ✅ Custom Integrations
- ✅ Professional Support - Dedicated discord + slack
- ✅ Custom SLAs
- ✅ Secure access with Single Sign-On
Contributing
We welcome contributions to LiteLLM! Whether you're fixing bugs, adding features, or improving documentation, we appreciate your help.
Quick Start for Contributors
This requires uv to be installed.
git clone https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
cd litellm
make install-dev # Install development dependencies
make format # Format your code
make lint # Run all linting checks
make test-unit # Run unit tests
make format-check # Check formatting only
For detailed contributing guidelines, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
📖 Contributing to documentation? The LiteLLM docs have moved to a separate repository: BerriAI/litellm-docs. Please open doc PRs there. Docs are served at docs.litellm.ai.
Code Quality / Linting
LiteLLM follows the Google Python Style Guide.
Our automated checks include:
- Black for code formatting
- Ruff for linting and code quality
- MyPy for type checking
- Circular import detection
- Import safety checks
All these checks must pass before your PR can be merged.
Support / talk with founders
- Schedule Demo 👋
- Community Discord 💭
- Community Slack 💭
- Our emails ✉️ ishaan@berri.ai / krrish@berri.ai